Skip to content
PixelScope Dutch

Venezuela Is Poised to Define Trump's Political Legacy - and America's Position in the World

In the wake of launching a evening of overwhelming force in Venezuela, Donald Trump seems to be entering the nation-building arena.

In a striking press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the president declared that US military forces had effectively captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then said that a group comprising Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be taking control of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "managing the nation" actually means is ambiguous, but the vow marks an dramatic shift in direction for the president, full of contradictions and formidable obstacles.

A leader who ran on opposing "endless conflicts", who sharply criticised past US attempts at overthrowing governments and who vowed to implement an "America First" international policy is now staking his administration on effectively rebuilding a South American nation whose economic system is in shambles and whose political stability has been undermined by years of authoritarian rule.

Yet, Trump was persistently confident.

He claimed his administration has a "perfect track record of winning" – and that this would be no different. He pledged to recruit American oil firms to repair Venezuela's deteriorating industrial infrastructure, supplying capital for the American reconstruction efforts and aiding the Venezuelan people.

He did not exclude sending American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We're not afraid of boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US intervention of Iraq, will now have to remember the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "If you shatter it, you are responsible for it."

A Shift in Foreign Policy

The US has redefined Venezuela's destiny – whether for good or ill.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a diplomat, but over the past year he has proven that he is more than willing to use military force worldwide.

In the past week, he authorized air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck nuclear facilities in Iran, suspected narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, rebel forces in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and jihadist fighters in Iraq.

Unlike past operations, which have mostly involved rockets and warplanes that reduce the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela strike – and his commitments to the fate of that nation – are markedly different.

His goal, he said during his press conference, is to "restore Venezuela's greatness."

Domestic and International Reaction

That variation of Trump's "MAGA" – or Maga - slogan could be difficult for some of Trump's followers to swallow.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump loyalist who broke with the president after accusing him of deserting his core supporters, was quick to condemn the president's actions on social media.

"Americans' disgust with our own government's perpetual military aggression and backing for overseas conflicts is justified because we are forced to finance it," she wrote. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another prominent Trump detractor, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the legal justification for Maduro's arrest – on arms and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to reclaim confiscated US oil and halt fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson characterizing the armed intervention against a "criminal regime" as "firm and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president said the Venezuelan operation advanced his "America First" priorities because it ensured US regional security and provided a steady source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an early 19th Century American foreign policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be without influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Trump Doctrine."

The move in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US supremacy in the Western Hemisphere will never be questioned again."

The goal of the new US security policy, he said, was to "protect trade, territory and resources that are core to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "backyard."

Trump's choice to capture Maduro will raise larger questions in international relations, however, and impact American ties with the world's other major global powers.

The Chinese foreign ministry issued a statement voicing surprise and condemning what it said was a reckless attack on a sovereign nation.

During the Biden administration, the US offered similar condemnations of Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to mediate a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be leaning to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a moderate Republican congressman, voiced worry about the precedent Trump's actions might send.

"My main worry is now Russia will use this to excuse their illegal and brutal military actions against Ukraine, or China to rationalize an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic opponents were blunter.

"America should not be administering other countries for any reason," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in perpetual conflicts and overthrow attempts that carry catastrophic results for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a criminal and a dictator with a record of human rights abuses. But he condemned Trump's decision not to inform legislative leaders before initiating the attack.

"Donald Trump has the constitutional responsibility to follow the law and protect democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he chose not to inform Congress because he was concerned they would "disclose" particulars of the operation prior to the attack.

A Path Forward Shrouded in Doubt

That military operation was a triumph – with zero American casualties and limited harm to US equipment. Trump, with his characteristic confidence, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most stunning, successful and impressive displays of American military might and competency in US history."

Now he is betting his legacy on that success continuing, as the US claims it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unknown. He and his team must rebuild a nation that has been in chaos for years while stabilising a region that is bound to be apprehensive of what Trump's foreign policy has planned for them.

By

Sierra Mitchell

Lena Visser is a Dutch photographer and writer with a passion for landscape and street photography.

PixelScope Dutch

Type to search articles.